ALERTE - PIJAC Canada
AoĂ»t 2009 - PIJAC Canada en danger de perdre son siĂšge sur le conseil dâadministration dâANIMA QuĂ©bec.
Face aux pressions grandissantes de diffĂ©rents groupes dâintĂ©rĂȘts, le MinistĂšre de lâAgriculture des PĂȘcheries et de lâAlimentation du QuĂ©bec (MAPAQ) songerait Ă rĂ©voquer le mandat dâadministrateur confiĂ© Ă PIJAC Canada par le Ministre Arseneault au printemps 2002. Le MAPAQ serait soudainement venu Ă la conclusion que PIJAC Canada est en conflit dâintĂ©rĂȘt et pourrait contribuer Ă nuire au travail dâANIMA QuĂ©bec.
PIJAC Canada a déjà fait savoir au MAPAQ son désaccord face à cette ligne de pensée, en invoquant les raisons suivantes :
ï·
La prestation de PIJAC Canada Ă titre dâadministrateur chez ANIMA QuĂ©bec est sans reproche depuis notre appointement au printemps de 2002;
ï·
PIJAC Canada possĂšde un vote sur une possibilitĂ© de neuf au Conseil dâadministration, comparativement Ă quatre mĂ©decins vĂ©tĂ©rinaires et trois votes pour les reprĂ©sentants des SPCA/SPA;
ï·
Pour des raisons Ă©videntes, depuis le dĂ©but de notre implication, nous avons choisis de ne pas nous impliquer dans tout ce qui touche le processus dâinspection;
ï·
PIJAC Canada a plutÎt choisi de concentrer ses énergies au niveau de la gestion et de la recherche de financement;
ï·
LâhypothĂšse de conflit dâintĂ©rĂȘt sâapplique tout autant aux reprĂ©sentants de SPCA/SPA, ayant eux aussi des membres qui sont sujets aux inspections;
ï·
Notre nomination nâest pas un prĂ©cĂ©dent : 4 des 7 membres dâAgri-TraçabilitĂ© QuĂ©bec, dont le prĂ©sident du CA, sont des reprĂ©sentants de lâUnion des producteurs agricoles (UPA);
ï·
Les membres actuels du conseil dâadministration dâANIMA QuĂ©bec sont eux aussi en dĂ©saccord avec lâorientation prĂ©conisĂ©e par le MAPAQ;
PIJAC Canada maintien que nous avons un droit lĂ©gitime Ă siĂ©ger sur le conseil dâadministration dâANIMA QuĂ©bec pour les raisons suivantes :
ï·
Nos membres mĂ©ritent eux aussi dâavoir leur secteur reprĂ©sentĂ© au sein du conseil dâadministration dâAnima QuĂ©bec;
ï·
Lâexpertise retrouvĂ©e au sein de notre industrie se veut un outil de soutien important pour ANIMA QuĂ©bec dans lâaccomplissement de sa mission;
ï·
Le retrait de PIJAC Canada causerait un tort certain aux futurs travaux dâANIMA QuĂ©bec;
ï·
Nous croyons fermement que la sĂ©curitĂ© et le bien-ĂȘtre des animaux au QuĂ©bec câest lâaffaire de tous;
Ce que vous pouvez faire :
ï·
Communiquez avec les représentants du MAPAQ et faites leur savoir votre désaccord avec cette décision;
ï·
Parlez Ă vos connaissances, vos clients, vos employĂ©s, etc. et demandez leurs de sâimpliquer aussi.
Envoyez vos lettres/courriels (avec une copie Ă PIJAC Canada) Ă Claude M. BĂ©chard, Ministre de lâAgriculture, des PĂȘcheries et de lâAlimentation du QuĂ©bec, Ă lâadresse suivante :
Cabinet du Ministre 200, chemin Sainte-Foy, 12e étage Québec QC G1R 4X6 Téléphone : (418) 380-2525 Télécopieur : (418) 380-2184
[email protected]ALERT - PIJAC Canada
August 2009 - PIJAC Canada at risk of losing its seat on the Board of ANIMA
Quebec.
Facing increased pressure from various interest groups, the Quebec Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAPAQ), is thinking of revoking the mandate given to our association in the spring of 2002 by Minister Arseneault. We were told that PIJAC Canadaâs presence on the board of Anima represents a conflict of interest that could end up negatively affecting their operations.
PIJAC Canada has already let the MAPAQ know that we disagree with their assessment, presenting the following arguments:
ï·
PIJAC Canadaâs performance as an ANIMA Quebec Board member has been without reproach since we were appointed in the spring of 2002;
ï·
PIJAC Canada carries one vote on a Board that presently counts a total of nine administrators, compared to four votes held by veterinarians and three by members of the SPCA community;
ï·
For obvious reasons since the beginning of our involvement, we have chosen to avoid getting involved in all areas that have something to do with the inspection process;
ï·
PIJAC Canada chose instead to concentrate to offer its help in the areas of management and fundraising;
ï·
The notion of conflict of interest applies equally to our fellow Board members from the SPCA community. After all, they represent businesses that are subject to inspections;
ï·
Our nomination does not set a precedent : 4 of the 7 board members of Agri-TraçabilitĂ© QuĂ©bec, including the President , are representatives of the UPA, ââ lâUnion des producteurs agricolesâ;
ï·
All the other Anima Quebec Board members disagree with the direction the MAPAQ wants to take;
PIJAC Canada maintains it has a legitimate right to sit on the Board of ANIMA Québec for the following reasons:
ï·
Our membership deserves to have its sector of the industry represented on the ANIMA Quebec Board;
ï·
The expertise found within our ranks offers an important support to ANIMA Quebec in the fulfillment of its mission;
ï·
PIJAC Canadaâs removal from the Board would cause serious harm to the future work of ANIMA QuĂ©bec;
ï·
Finally, we strongly believe that the safety and welfare of companion animals is everybodyâs business.
What can you do?
ï·
Contact a MAPAQ representative and let them know you disagree with their decision;
ï·
Talk about this to your friends and colleagues, your clients and employees and ask them to get involved.
Please send your letter/email, (with a copy to PIJAC Canada) to Claude M. Béchard, Quebec Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAPAQ) at the following address:
Ministerâs Cabinet 200 Sainte-Foy Road, 12th Floor Quebec QC G1R 4X6 Telephone : (418) 380-2525 Fax : (418) 380-2184
[email protected]